Insurer-Friendly Ruling in PIP Dispute Draws Criticism from Giller

As an authority on insurance law, attorney Jason Giller was asked to analyze a recent State Farm PIP reimbursement case. He criticized the ruling, stating, "It’s further confirmation that insurers use confusing and illusory language to undermine the premise of insurance—to make insureds whole." Giller argued the decision ignores the good-faith obligations of insurers, showcasing the firm's commitment to policyholder rights and battling unfair insurance law practices.

Read the full article on Law.com (subscription may be required)

Previous
Previous

Victim in $650K+ Millwork Fraud Case Represented by Giller P.A

Next
Next

Jason Giller on Trustee Duties in $275M Estate Dispute